<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I feel lucky, but still need The Scrupski Rules</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.socialmediatherapy.com/2009/03/13/i-feel-lucky-but-still-need-the-scrupski-rules/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.socialmediatherapy.com/2009/03/13/i-feel-lucky-but-still-need-the-scrupski-rules/</link>
	<description>a.k.a. social media consultant/blogging coach/social media workshops instructor</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 22:12:16 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: kathleen</title>
		<link>http://www.socialmediatherapy.com/2009/03/13/i-feel-lucky-but-still-need-the-scrupski-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-670</link>
		<dc:creator>kathleen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 11:18:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialmediatherapy.com/?p=1804#comment-670</guid>
		<description>Seriously? 
&lt;blockquote&gt;Don’t ever edit or rewrite something that you wrote in the past.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
You&#039;re supposed to muck up long lines with strike outs ad nauseum really killing the flow... what&#039;s the justification for that? So you can be &quot;true&quot; to some kind of external judge and jury or self? Why?

I write a technical blog, it&#039;s not an easy short read. I absolutely and without reserve, hesitation or guilt, will rewrite awkward or confusing verbiage as I come across it. Until I read this, I didn&#039;t realize editing was a no-no. I think this is one of those made up rules that somebody thought sounded good at the time but serves no real purpose other than the blogger&#039;s ego in some perverse way.

In sum, your internal editor and judge is the only one who cares whether your entries remain &quot;pure&quot;. Nobody else cares. All a visitor will notice is how crappy it reads and they may even think you&#039;re lazy for not fixing it. Anything else is a disservice to readers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seriously? </p>
<blockquote><p>Don’t ever edit or rewrite something that you wrote in the past.</p></blockquote>
<p>You&#8217;re supposed to muck up long lines with strike outs ad nauseum really killing the flow&#8230; what&#8217;s the justification for that? So you can be &#8220;true&#8221; to some kind of external judge and jury or self? Why?</p>
<p>I write a technical blog, it&#8217;s not an easy short read. I absolutely and without reserve, hesitation or guilt, will rewrite awkward or confusing verbiage as I come across it. Until I read this, I didn&#8217;t realize editing was a no-no. I think this is one of those made up rules that somebody thought sounded good at the time but serves no real purpose other than the blogger&#8217;s ego in some perverse way.</p>
<p>In sum, your internal editor and judge is the only one who cares whether your entries remain &#8220;pure&#8221;. Nobody else cares. All a visitor will notice is how crappy it reads and they may even think you&#8217;re lazy for not fixing it. Anything else is a disservice to readers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sue Rostvold</title>
		<link>http://www.socialmediatherapy.com/2009/03/13/i-feel-lucky-but-still-need-the-scrupski-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-230</link>
		<dc:creator>Sue Rostvold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 03:47:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialmediatherapy.com/?p=1804#comment-230</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comment Liz. Of course I&#039;d love to introduce you to Susan sometime! I think you&#039;d really like her.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment Liz. Of course I&#8217;d love to introduce you to Susan sometime! I think you&#8217;d really like her.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liz Arreaga</title>
		<link>http://www.socialmediatherapy.com/2009/03/13/i-feel-lucky-but-still-need-the-scrupski-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-216</link>
		<dc:creator>Liz Arreaga</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 18:05:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialmediatherapy.com/?p=1804#comment-216</guid>
		<description>Wow Susan sounds interesting. Would love to meet her and talk Enterprise 2.0 someday. Hey, since your friends, will you set that up? :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow Susan sounds interesting. Would love to meet her and talk Enterprise 2.0 someday. Hey, since your friends, will you set that up? :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
